Miriam Zoll says that the technology has not worked for 20 million women
Critics of the IVF industry in the US have attacked “misleading” marketing strategies that encourage older women to use IVF.
In an interview published by the New York Times this week, Miriam Zoll — a vocal opponent of the IVF industry — criticised the “deceptive” marketing of IVF to women over the age of 40. Zoll, who herself unsuccessfully tried to conceive via IVF at age 39, says that the industry takes advantage of the naive women who eager to conceive:
“The industry [avoids] saying that the technology hasn’t worked for an estimated 20 million women globally during the last 40 years”.
The article also quotes Dr. Mark V. Sauer, former director of the I.V.F. clinic at Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, who says that “there’s hardly any age that the [IVF] clinics now turn away”.
It is generally accepted, Sauer says, that IVF has little promise for women over the age of 40. Yet Oxford bioethicist and neonatologist Dominic Wilkinson believes this should be clarified. In an article in The Conversation this week, Wilkinson states that success rates for older women increase dramatically when donor eggs are used:
“…these “success” rates are based on IVF treatment with the woman’s own eggs. For women who receive donor eggs or embryos, the chances of a live birth are based on the donor’s age, not on that of the recipient. Where the egg donor is young, older women have the same sort of chances of “success” with IVF as younger women.”
Does IVF actually work for women over 40?
- Can machines be moral? - March 7, 2021
- Can we synthesise Christianity moral theology with secular bioethics? - November 28, 2020
- Euthanasia polling data may fail to capture people’s considered views - August 15, 2020