No need to destroy embryos, says US bioethics committee
There may be ethical ways to obtain pluripotent, genetically stable, and long-lived stem cells, says the President’s Council on Bioethics in . It has identified four such possible approaches: stem cells from dead embryos; from living embryos, by non-destructive biopsy; from bioengineered embryo-like artefacts; and from reprogrammed adult somatic cells.
The chairman of the council, Dr Leon Kass, says that the proposals deserve the nation’s — and especially its scientists’ — “careful and serious consideration”. But since they are all unusual alternatives to the use of a readily available resource, they are unlikely to be welcomed by most stem cell scientists.
Latest posts by Mumbai (see all)
- Prescribe morning-after pills to young teenagers, say US pediatric group - November 30, 2012
- Bahrain sentences protest docs to prison - November 28, 2012
- Terry Pratchett assisted suicide documentary wins International Emmy - November 27, 2012
More Stories
A first in France: a trans mum and a trans dad
Trigger warning: if you are easily confused by gender pronouns, this story from France may cause heart palpitations. February 19...
Nigerian power couple convicted in London over organ trafficking plot
In May last year, a young Nigerian man stumbled into a police station into the English town of Staines, in...
Cease and desist: Dutch sperm donor who has fathered 550 children is being sued
A Dutch woman and a foundation for children of sperm donors are suing a Dutch man for fathering too many...
Should intractable mental illness make you eligible for euthanasia?
Canada is in the middle of a vigorous debate about whether incurable mental illness is grounds for Medical Assistance in...
Belgium to permit multiple gender ID changes
Belgium will permit people to change their gender identity as often as they want. The Minister of Justice, Vincent Van...
Nature’s foray into politics may have backfired
In the 2020 election, a swag of high-profile science journals, including Nature, Science, The Lancet, and the New England Journal...