The Council of the District of Columbia is set to debate euthanasia legislation later this month.
The Council of the District of Columbia is set to debate euthanasia legislation later this month, after a five member Committee on Health and Human Services this week approved a draft euthanasia bill.
The bill was sponsored by Councillor Mary Cheh, who believes the State “should not stand in the way” of someone wishing to “peacefully” end their life.
The bill would allow D.C. patients, at least 18 years old, who are terminally ill and expected to die within six months to obtain a prescription from a physician for a death-inducing drug.
The Washington Post has expressed its support for the proposed legislation, saying that “the District should add its name to the list of places that offer their citizens compassion and control at life’s end.”
Yet a number of bioethicists have voiced concern about the risks entailed by legislative reform. Writing in The Washington Post, Allan Roberts of the Pelligrino Centre for Clincal Bioethics and Scott Red of Reformed Theological Seminary said that the legislation posed an indirect threat to “individual dignity”.
“When we make human dignity merely a matter of human autonomy, we risk devaluing the dignity of human community, and we neglect the importance of the individual as a member of a broader community that itself enriches dignity. Such a balance between the individual and the community safeguards against radical individualism like the type that we see expressed in the D.C. Death With Dignity Act.”
The bill is scheduled for discussion by the full 13 member council on the October 18.
The District debates euthanasia
- Can machines be moral? - March 7, 2021
- Can we synthesise Christianity moral theology with secular bioethics? - November 28, 2020
- Euthanasia polling data may fail to capture people’s considered views - August 15, 2020