DROPPING THE WORD "CLONING"

The word “cloning” gives the public bad vibes, say biologists who support cloning of the therapeutic variety. They are trying to substitute the clumsier technical term “somatic cell nuclear transfer”. The word “cloning” would be reserved for attempts to create a human baby and not a human embryo.

And the change works. Kathy Hudson, of the Genetics and Public Policy Center in Washington DC found that while only 29% of people surveyed approved of “cloning”, 46% approved of “SCNT”. But the change doesn’t work altogether as expected. When people were asked whether they approved of creating babies with cloning, only 10% agreed. But when asked about creating babies with SCNT, the approval rating more than doubled, to 26%.

Author
Recent Posts

Michael Cook

Michael Cook edits BioEdge, a bioethics newsletter, and MercatorNet, an on-line magazine whose focus is human dignity. He writes from Sydney, Australia.

BioEdge

BioEdge has closed its doors

How liberal are American bioethicists?

Doctors can be socialized to cooperate in morally despicable evil, says bioethicist

3 sperm donors from same family in Quebec have sired 600 children

American IVF clinics are happily offering sex selection

Owner of castration website in UK found guilty of grievous bodily harm

Missouri man killed wife because he couldn’t afford her medical bills

World Medical Association calls for a bilateral ceasefire in Gaza

Female doctors’ patients may have lower mortality and hospital readmission rates

DROPPING THE WORD “CLONING”