21st-century eugenics
Hi there,
The Google of genetics, a California company called 23andme (after our 23 chromosomes) has denied that it is in the business of providing toolkits for creating designer babies. (See story below.) Instead, it just wants to provide consumers with better ways to manage their health and their children’s health.
Could be. But it’s more likely that it is simply unsure of what the market wants. The company has been re-inventing itself over the past year. It slashed the price of its spit kit, hired a CEO whose expertise is selling luxury goods online and launched a slick TV advertisement. And it is moving heaven and earth to get 1 million people on its database. “With a million people, we become disruptive,” says co-founder Anne Wojcicki.
Designing babies may not be a major product, but it will surely be one of them, along with ancestry research and detection of genetic diseases. 23andme is lean, mean and hungry – it will supply whatever the market wants. And if the market wants designer babies, why not?
We are accustomed to think of eugenics as a dark government-run totalitarian program to eliminate people who are regarded as unfit, disabled and racially inferior. But those days are over. Twenty-first Century eugenics will be a pastel-coloured, smiley, do-it-yourself, consumer-driven project. And if it ever happens, I think that it will look a lot like 23andme.
Michael Cook
A brash genetic testing company, 23andme, is well-placed to enter the designer baby market.
1381073192
More Stories
Canada has a dark past as a champion of eugenics for the disabled
Canada is acquiring a reputation for being the most progressive place on the planet for euthanasia. An article in the...
Driven mad by eugenics: a true crime drama from Spain
Eugenics with assisted reproduction technology is not new. Francis Galton, Charles Darwin’s cousin, devised schemes for making higher and lower...
A brief history of California’s eugenics program — which ran from 1909-2013
It is a commonsense view that government spending is generally inefficient compared to spending by private people and businesses. As...
Nature’s mea culpa for promoting eugenics
Earlier this year, the world’s leading science journal, Nature, and its companion journals embarked upon a campaign to purge from...
Can we please define ‘eugenics’ before criticizing it?
Robert Reich, a leading economist and secretary of labor in the Clinton administration, has denounced the “eugenic” policies of Viktor...
Another step forward towards artificial gametes
Have scientists moved a step closer to in vitro gametogenesis – creating human embryos from artificial eggs and sperm? In...