Pat Robertson, the colourful American televangelist with a gift for making headline opinions, has ventured into a controversial dimension of end-of-life care. In his 700 Club television show, he was asked about the ethics of divorcing a spouse with Alzheimer’s disease. Tough question, said Robertson, a very tough question. But Alzheimer’s is a kind of death, so perhaps it is ethically permissible.

The preacher was attacked on both fronts: by liberals for being a heartless hypocrite who would abandon a sick wife and by fellow evangelicals for being an unscriptural moral relativist. Doctors commented that emotional responses linger on, even if a person becomes incompetent.

The controversy highlights public uncertainties over how to deal with people who are not responsive. A recent study showed that people felt that patients in a permanent vegetative state were “more dead than dead”. With an avalanche of dementia inexorably rolling over the US, more people than Pat Robertson will be wrestling with this question. ~ Slate, Sept 16

Michael Cook
Alzheimer’s disease
dementia

• Author
• Recent Posts

Michael Cook

Michael Cook edits BioEdge, a bioethics newsletter, and MercatorNet, an on-line magazine whose focus is human dignity. He writes from Sydney, Australia.

Latest posts by Michael Cook (see all)

• How long can you put off seeing the doctor because of lockdowns? - December 3, 2021
• House of Lords debates assisted suicide—again - October 28, 2021
• Spanish government tries to restrict conscientious objection - October 28, 2021