The world’s leading science journal, Nature, may end up with egg on its face as complaints mount about a recent paper on a radical new method of creating pluripotent stem cells.

A mouse embryo formed with Stimulus-Triggered Acquisition of Pluripotency (STAP) cells

 The world’s leading science journal, Nature, may end up with egg on its face as complaints mount about a recent paper on a radical new method of creating pluripotent stem cells.

One of the co-authors, Japanese stem cell scientist Teruhiko Wakayama, has called for the paper to be retracted after problems surfaced with the images and allegations of plagiarism. He now says that he is not sure that the cells given to him were really created by the technique. “I have lost faith in the paper,” he told Japanese media. “Overall there are now just too many uncertainties about it. I think we have to wait for some confirmation.” 

The original paper about “stimulus-triggered acquisition of pluripotency” (STAP) cells was published in Nature on January 30. A team led by Haruko Obokata of the RIKEN Center for Developmental Biology in Kobe, Japan, claimed that it had developed a way to reprogram cells to an embryonic state by bathing them in an acidic solution. The idea was so simple, yet so radical, that other scientists reacted with both amazement and scepticism. At the moment, the second emotion is dominant. 

Michael Cook
https://www.bioedge.org/images/2008images/TH_embryos9087.jpg
Creative commons
stem cells

• Author
• Recent Posts

Michael Cook

Michael Cook edits BioEdge, a bioethics newsletter, and MercatorNet, an on-line magazine whose focus is human dignity. He writes from Sydney, Australia.

Latest posts by Michael Cook (see all)

• How long can you put off seeing the doctor because of lockdowns? - December 3, 2021
• House of Lords debates assisted suicide—again - October 28, 2021
• Spanish government tries to restrict conscientious objection - October 28, 2021