Hi there,

Euthanasia is back in the news. A new
report from a British think tank is highly critical. The author, Cristina
Odone, argues that the “chattering classes” will suffer none of the harms of
legalised euthanasia, protected as they are by their network of friends and
colleagues. It is the vulnerable who will be expected to take early leave: the
elderly without relatives, the poor, the disabled, and so on. It is a
well-informed and impassioned essay.

One of the news items in this week’s
newsletter might support her view. A paediatric palliative care doctor from
Vancouver describes how he helped five newborn disabled infants to die. No
doubt the children had a very short life expectancy. But his solution was to
pump them so full of sedatives that they could not cry – or disturb the parents
– and to withdraw all nutrition and hydration so that they died of thirst and
starvation. But it was still very distressing for the parents to look on as
their child became more and more emaciated until it passed away. At least one
of the children lasted 26 days.

“It’s very hard to study because this is ethically
a very sensitive area,” he says. Is this the right way to deal with disabled
newborns? Something doesn’t seem quite right here. Any ideas from readers?

Cheers,

Michael Cook
Editor

• Author
• Recent Posts

Michael Cook

Michael Cook edits BioEdge, a bioethics newsletter, and MercatorNet, an on-line magazine whose focus is human dignity. He writes from Sydney, Australia.

Latest posts by Michael Cook (see all)

• How long can you put off seeing the doctor because of lockdowns? - December 3, 2021
• House of Lords debates assisted suicide—again - October 28, 2021
• Spanish government tries to restrict conscientious objection - October 28, 2021